On this page

Summarize with AI
Open this article in your favorite AI assistant for a quick summary.
For those MSPs paying attention to the evening news, you've probably heard about the FBI case with Apple. For those of you not familiar, here are the quick facts.
The San Bernardino terrorists had Apple iPhones, which were locked when they committed their crimes. The husband's iPhone, owned by San Bernardino county and now in FBI possession, may have important information and the authorities are interested in seeing what's on the phone.
The FBI has failed to access the iPhone because it is locked and repeated attempts to enter the passcode will result in the phone erasing its data. The FBI has asked Apple to help them break into the phone. Apple has refused. We now have a growing legal debate, as well as a technology debate in our country about law enforcement and personal privacy.
Privacy vs. Law Enforcement
There are two undeniable forces at play here, the need for law enforcement to investigate a crime which already took place, and the rights of citizens to be safe, secure, and free from unauthorized governmental intrusion.
The fact that this is a crime that has already occurred is important because this debate might be different if this was a phone belonging to a living person only accused of a crime. The phone belonged to a person (now dead) who committed a terrorist act. There is a legitimate need for the FBI to see the contents of the phone.